 Remarks on Pisano: “toward a prescriptive theory of dynamic capabilities”Greg Linden and David J Teece Industrial and Corporate Change, 2018, vol. 27, issue 6, 1175-1179 Abstract: Pisano's recent ICC article offers some clarity around the pursuit and development of new capabilities, but it overreaches by equating this with dynamic capabilities as a whole. The capabilities that he discusses are, for the most part, simply technologies that can be thought of as “ordinary capabilities”. Moreover, his approach isolates capability selection from strategy. Opportunities must be sensed and calibrated and a strategy developed before capability gaps can be identified. Pisano also treats general-purpose capabilities as an option without acknowledging their dependence on the stage of the industry lifecycle. In mature industries, general-purpose technologies are less likely to be relevant. While there is much of value in Pisano's article about technology selection and risk, this is overshadowed by the claims he makes for the magnitude of the article's contribution to dynamic capabilities research. JEL-codes: L1 M1 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:indcch:v:27:y:2018:i:6:p:1175-1179. Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Industrial and Corporate Change is currently edited by Josef Chytry More articles in Industrial and Corporate Change from Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.