March and the pursuit of organizational intelligence: the interplay between procedural rationality and sensible foolishness
William Ocasio,
Luke Rhee and
Dylan Boynton
Industrial and Corporate Change, 2020, vol. 29, issue 1, 225-239
Abstract:
March’s long and varied career in organization theory encompasses a number of seemingly disparate themes from rationality, to ambiguity and the garbage can model, to exploration and exploitation in organizations. We examine March’s diverse research trajectory and conclude that his different insights can be brought together under one common theme for his career: that both procedural rationality and sensible foolishness are necessary for the pursuit of organizational intelligence. Traditional models of rationality, even bounded rationality, are insufficient because goals are unstable and inconsistent, and causal ambiguity leads to myopic learning or worse. To explain the interplay between procedural rationality and sensible foolishness in organizations, we explore their role in the inter-related processes of programing, monitoring, sensemaking, search, and decision making.
JEL-codes: B52 M10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtz068 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:indcch:v:29:y:2020:i:1:p:225-239.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Industrial and Corporate Change is currently edited by Josef Chytry
More articles in Industrial and Corporate Change from Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().