Randomisation and Its Discontents
Glenn Harrison
Journal of African Economies, 2011, vol. 20, issue 4, 626-652
Abstract:
Randomised control trials have become popular tools in development economics. The key idea is to exploit deliberate or naturally occurring randomisation of treatments in order to make causal inferences about "what works" to promote some development objective. The expression"what works" is crucial: the emphasis is on evidence-based conclusions that will have immediate policy use. No room for good intentions, wishful thinking, ideological biases, Washington Consensus, cost-benefit calculations or even parametric stochastic assumptions. A valuable byproduct has been the identification of questions that other methods might answer, or that subsequent randomised evaluations might address. An unattractive byproduct has been the dumbing down of econometric practice, the omission of any cost-benefit analytics and an arrogance towards other methodologies. Fortunately, the latter are gratuitous, and the former point towards important complementarities in methods to help address knotty, substantive issues in development economics. Copyright 2011 , Oxford University Press.
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jae/ejr030 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:626-652
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of African Economies is currently edited by Francis Teal
More articles in Journal of African Economies from Centre for the Study of African Economies Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().