A Conceptual and Empirical Comparison of Alternative Household Life Cycle Models

Charles M Schaninger and William D Danko

Journal of Consumer Research, 1993, vol. 19, issue 4, 580-94

Abstract: In this article we conceptually and empirically compare a number of alternative family life cycle models, ranging from traditional to "modernized." These comparisons evaluate each model's ability to identify homogeneous categories, maximize between-group variation, classify nearly all households, and result in a reasonably small number of sufficient size categories. Our empirical comparisons consist of a number of between- and within-category a priori contrasts related to these criteria, as well as overall tests of each model's ability to capture attitudinal, leisure activity, and consumption differences. While the model of M. C. Lilly and B. M. Enis outperformed other models overall, we suggest potential modifications based on our a priori comparison findings. We also provide recommendations for future research to determine how to best incorporate nontraditional family forms. Copyright 1993 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209324 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:19:y:1993:i:4:p:580-94

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Consumer Research is currently edited by Bernd Schmitt, June Cotte, Markus Giesler, Andrew Stephen and Stacy Wood

More articles in Journal of Consumer Research from Journal of Consumer Research Inc.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().