EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are Studies of Dark Side Variables Confounded by Socially Desirable Responding? The Case of Materialism

David Mick

Journal of Consumer Research, 1996, vol. 23, issue 2, 106-19

Abstract: Socially desirable responding (SDR) is the tendency of individuals to make themselves look good according to current cultural norms when answering researchers' questions. For over 50 years in the social sciences, SDR has been a complex and controversial issue, typically viewed as a contaminating response bias. Meanwhile, most consumer researchers have neglected SDR, including those studying sensitive "dark side" topics where SDR could have an especially detrimental impact on research conclusions. This article reviews conceptual, measurement, and statistical analysis issues related to SDR. Two surveys are then reported that explore the effect of SDR on testing propositions about the nomological network surrounding the materialism value. Implications and recommendations are discussed for investigating SDR in consumer research, including opportunities for future contributions. Copyright 1996 by the University of Chicago.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (54)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209470 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:23:y:1996:i:2:p:106-19

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Consumer Research is currently edited by Bernd Schmitt, June Cotte, Markus Giesler, Andrew Stephen and Stacy Wood

More articles in Journal of Consumer Research from Journal of Consumer Research Inc.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:23:y:1996:i:2:p:106-19