 The Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk on Consumers' Evaluations of Product Incongruity: Preference for the NormMargaret C Campbell and Ronald C Goodstein Journal of Consumer Research, 2001, vol. 28, issue 3, 439-49 Abstract: Research supports the existence of a "moderate incongruity effect" such that an option that is moderately inconsistent with an evoked product category schema is sometimes preferred to a congruent option. We propose that perceived risk is an important situational factor that moderates the impact of congruity on evaluations. Three studies show that the positive evaluation of moderately incongruent products, relative to congruent ones, does not appear when there is risk associated with product selection. When consumers perceive high risk associated with a purchase, the moderate incongruity effect is reversed such that the congruent is preferred to the moderately incongruent product. Only in conditions where subjects perceived no real risk did the positive effect of moderate incongruity appear. The limiting effect of perceived risk appears to be due to consumers' "preferences for the norm" under high-risk conditions. The set of findings are discussed as they relate to and extend current thinking about the effects of moderate incongruity on evaluations. Copyright 2001 by the University of Chicago. Date: 2001 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:28:y:2001:i:3:p:439-49 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Consumer Research is currently edited by Bernd Schmitt, June Cotte, Markus Giesler, Andrew Stephen and Stacy Wood More articles in Journal of Consumer Research from Journal of Consumer Research Inc. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.