Economics at your fingertips  

The Biasing Health Halos of Fast-Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions

Pierre Chandon and Brian Wansink

Journal of Consumer Research, 2007, vol. 34, issue 3, 301-314

Abstract: Why is America a land of low-calorie food claims yet high-calorie food intake? Four studies show that people are more likely to underestimate the caloric content of main dishes and to choose higher-calorie side dishes, drinks, or desserts when fast-food restaurants claim to be healthy (e.g., Subway) compared to when they do not (e.g., McDonald's). We also find that the effect of these health halos can be eliminated by simply asking people to consider whether the opposite of such health claims may be true. These studies help explain why the success of fast-food restaurants serving lower-calorie foods has not led to the expected reduction in total calorie intake and in obesity rates. They also suggest innovative strategies for consumers, marketers, and policy makers searching for ways to fight obesity. (c) 2007 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (16) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Consumer Research from Oxford University Press
Series data maintained by Oxford University Press ().

Page updated 2017-09-29
Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:34:y:2007:i:3:p:301-314