The Biasing Health Halos of Fast-Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions
Pierre Chandon and
Journal of Consumer Research, 2007, vol. 34, issue 3, 301-314
Why is America a land of low-calorie food claims yet high-calorie food intake? Four studies show that people are more likely to underestimate the caloric content of main dishes and to choose higher-calorie side dishes, drinks, or desserts when fast-food restaurants claim to be healthy (e.g., Subway) compared to when they do not (e.g., McDonald's). We also find that the effect of these health halos can be eliminated by simply asking people to consider whether the opposite of such health claims may be true. These studies help explain why the success of fast-food restaurants serving lower-calorie foods has not led to the expected reduction in total calorie intake and in obesity rates. They also suggest innovative strategies for consumers, marketers, and policy makers searching for ways to fight obesity. (c) 2007 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (16) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/519499 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:34:y:2007:i:3:p:301-314
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Consumer Research from Oxford University Press
Series data maintained by Oxford University Press ().