Is remoteness a locational disadvantage?
Kristian Behrens (),
Gianmarco Ottaviano () and
Jacques Thisse ()
Journal of Economic Geography, 2006, vol. 6, issue 3, 347-368
We study the impacts of changes in international trade and domestic transport costs on the internal geography of countries in the presence of geographical asymmetries. To do so, we develop a two-country four-region model in which one country has a region that exhibits a 'geographical advantage' in terms of better access to the other country's markets. Our analysis reveals that, in equilibrium, the space-economies of the trading partners are interdependent and that agglomeration in one country reduces the occurrence of agglomeration in the other, thus showing that physical geography suffices to build strong connections between the two space-economies. We also show that remoteness need not be a geographical disadvantage since a landlocked region may well be the location that attracts the larger share of firms. This is so when internal transport costs are high and, therefore, act as a barrier to competition from abroad. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (33) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Is remoteness a locational disadvantage? (2012)
Working Paper: Is remoteness a locational disadvantage? (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:6:y:2006:i:3:p:347-368
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Geography is currently edited by Diego Puga and Neil Wrigley
More articles in Journal of Economic Geography from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().