EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Discriminating Between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: a Qualitative Test

Robin Cubitt, Gijs Kuilen and Sujoy Mukerji

Journal of the European Economic Association, 2020, vol. 18, issue 2, 708-749

Abstract: During recent decades, many new models have emerged in pure and applied economic theory according to which agents’ choices may be sensitive to ambiguity in the uncertainty that faces them. The exchange between Epstein (2010) and Klibanoff et al. (2012) identified a notable behavioral issue that distinguishes sharply between two classes of models of ambiguity sensitivity that are importantly different. The two classes are exemplified by the α-maxmin expected utility (MEU) model and the smooth ambiguity model, respectively; and the issue is whether or not a desire to hedge independently resolving ambiguities contributes to an ambiguity-averse agent's preference for a randomized act. Building on this insight, we implement an experiment whose design provides a qualitative test that discriminates between the two classes of models. Among subjects identified as ambiguity sensitive, we find greater support for the class exemplified by the smooth ambiguity model; the relative support is stronger among subjects identified as ambiguity averse. This finding has implications for applications that rely on specific models of ambiguity preference.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvz005 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Discriminating between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: A Qualitative Test (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Discriminating between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: A Qualitative Test (2014) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:18:y:2020:i:2:p:708-749.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the European Economic Association is currently edited by Romain Wacziarg

More articles in Journal of the European Economic Association from European Economic Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-17
Handle: RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:18:y:2020:i:2:p:708-749.