Voting Rights, Agenda Control and Information Aggregation
Laurent Bouton,
Aniol Llorente-Saguer,
Antonin Macé and
Dimitrios Xefteris
Journal of the European Economic Association, 2024, vol. 22, issue 6, 2598-2647
Abstract:
This paper examines the comparative properties of voting rules based on the richness of their ballot spaces, assuming a given distribution of voting rights. We focus on how well voting rules aggregate the information dispersed among voters. We consider how different voting rules affect both voters’ decisions at the voting stage and the incentives of the agenda-setter, who decides whether to put the proposal to a vote. Without agenda-setter, the voting efficiency of rules is higher when their ballot space is richer. Moreover, full-information efficiency requires full divisibility of the votes. In the presence of an agenda-setter, we uncover a novel trade-off: in some cases, rules with high voting efficiency provide worse incentives to the agenda-setter to select good proposals. This negative effect can be large enough to wash out the higher voting efficiency of even the most efficient rules.
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvae035 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Voting Rights, Agenda Control and Information Aggregation (2024) 
Working Paper: Voting Rights, Agenda Control and Information Aggregation (2024) 
Working Paper: Voting Rights, Agenda Control and Information Aggregation (2021) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:22:y:2024:i:6:p:2598-2647.
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the European Economic Association is currently edited by Romain Wacziarg
More articles in Journal of the European Economic Association from European Economic Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().