Promises, Trust, and Contracts

Yongmin Chen

The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2000, vol. 16, issue 1, 209-32

Abstract: A transaction involving a buyer and a competitive seller is studied under the hypothesis that individuals may have a certain tendency to keep promises. The parties can choose a complete contract where costly arrangements are made so that it is verifiable whether the seller has delivered a certain quality. Alternatively, they can choose an incomplete contract where the quality agreed upon by the two parties is unverifiable, and one party is given the residual right to decide whether the quality is indeed delivered. Although complete contracts are always available, it may be optimal to use incomplete contracts, and social surplus can increase in contract costs. Social surplus is higher when the buyer has the residual right if under this arrangement incomplete contracts are optimal and social surplus is higher when the seller has the residual right if only under this arrangement incomplete contracts are optimal. Copyright 2000 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (43)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:16:y:2000:i:1:p:209-32

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization is currently edited by Andrea Prat

More articles in The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().