EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mediation in Situations of Conflict and Limited Commitment

Kay Mitusch and Roland Strausz

The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2005, vol. 21, issue 2, 467-500

Abstract: We study the reasons and conditions under which mediation is beneficial when a principal needs information from an agent to implement an action. Assuming a strong form of limited commitment, the principal may employ a mediator who gathers information and makes nonbinding proposals. We show that a partial revelation of information is more effective through a mediator than through the agent himself. This implies that mediation is strictly helpful if and only if the likelihood of a conflict of interest is positive but not too high. The value of mediation depends nonmonotonically on the degree of conflict. Our insights extend to general models of contracting with imperfect commitment. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/ewi018 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Mediation in Situations of Conflict and Limited Commitment (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Mediation in Situations of Conflict and Limited Commitment Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:21:y:2005:i:2:p:467-500

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization is currently edited by Andrea Prat

More articles in The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:21:y:2005:i:2:p:467-500