Subjective Performance Evaluations, Collusion, and Organizational Design

Veikko Thiele

The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2013, vol. 29, issue 1, 35-59

Abstract: Many scholars have emphasized the importance of subjective performance evaluations in employment relationships to provide employees with effort incentives. This article examines when delegating subjective appraisals to managers is optimal. Delegation facilitates more accurate performance evaluations but can also lead to collusion. To prevent collusive behavior, I show that firms need to reduce effort incentives for employees and leave managers with economic rents through higher compensations. Despite these costs of preventing collusion, I find that delegation can be optimal. The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Yale University. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/ewr021 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:29:y:2013:i:1:p:35-59

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization is currently edited by Andrea Prat

More articles in The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().