Refusal to Deal, Intellectual Property Rights, and Antitrust

Yongmin Chen

The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2014, vol. 30, issue 3, 533-557

Abstract: A vertically integrated firm, having acquired the intellectual property (IP) through innovation to become an input monopolist, can extract surplus by supplying efficient downstream competitors. That the monopolist would refuse to do so is puzzling and has led to numerous debates in antitrust. In this article, I clarify the economic logic of refusal to deal and identify conditions under which prohibiting such conduct would raise or lower consumer and social welfare. I further show how IP protection (as determined by IP laws) and restrictions on IP holders’ conduct (as determined by antitrust laws) may interact to affect innovation incentive and post-innovation market performance. (JEL K2, L4, O3).

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jleo/ewt004 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Refusal to Deal, Intellectual Property Rights, and Antitrust (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jleorg:v:30:y:2014:i:3:p:533-557.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization is currently edited by Andrea Prat

More articles in The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().