A test of the signalling hypothesis
Monojit Chatterji,
Paul Seaman and
Larry D. Singell
Oxford Economic Papers, 2003, vol. 55, issue 2, 191-215
Abstract:
Education may enhance earnings either because of human capital increases or by signalling unobservable worker attributes. Previous tests of these alternatives relied on ad hoc distinctions between them. Our theoretical model provides a direct signal measure as the difference between required and necessary qualifications, forming the basis for an ordered-probit model of discrete differences between required and necessary qualifications that depend on firm, job, and worker attributes. Estimates support the model's predictions, providing a continuous, predicted signal measure for second-stage earnings equations. These results provide the first formal evidence of a significant, positive, gender-specific return to a signal and indicate a downward bias in the return to education from excluding the signal measure. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Working Paper: A Test Of The Signalling Hypothesis
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:55:y:2003:i:2:p:191-215
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Oxford Economic Papers is currently edited by James Forder and Francis J. Teal
More articles in Oxford Economic Papers from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().