Does intellectual property protection spur technological change?
Sunil Kanwar and
Oxford Economic Papers, 2003, vol. 55, issue 2, 235-264
Of the diverse factors motivating technological change, one factor that has received increasing attention in the recent past has been the protection of intellectual property rights. Given fairly recent changes in the international policy ethos where a regime of stronger intellectual property protection has become a fait accompli for most developing countries (and the developed too), it is of some significance to ask whether more stringent protection of intellectual property does indeed encourage innovation. And this is the question which this paper examines, utilising cross-country panel data on R&D investment, patent protection and other country-specific characteristics spanning the period 1981--95. The evidence unambiguously indicates the significance of intellectual property rights as incentives for spurring innovation. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (112) Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Working Paper: Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change? (2004)
Working Paper: Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change? (2001)
Working Paper: Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:55:y:2003:i:2:p:235-264
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Oxford Economic Papers is currently edited by A. Banerjee and James Forder
More articles in Oxford Economic Papers from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().