Imitation, patent protection, and welfare
Arijit Mukherjee and
Enrico Pennings
Oxford Economic Papers, 2004, vol. 56, issue 4, 715-733
Abstract:
Newly developed technologies run the risk of being imitated when patents are long and imitation cost is low. This paper shows that the innovator has the incentive to postpone technology adoption when imitation is a credible threat but imitation cost is not below a certain threshold. The possibility of licensing eliminates or at least reduces the incentive for delayed technology adoption. Further, this paper explains the advantages of a forward licensing contract versus a simple licensing contract in terms of profits and social welfare. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpf062 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Imitation, patent protection and welfare (2001) 
Working Paper: Imitation, patent protection and welfare (2000)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:56:y:2004:i:4:p:715-733
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Oxford Economic Papers is currently edited by James Forder and Francis J. Teal
More articles in Oxford Economic Papers from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().