Rational inattention and employer learning
Steffen Habermalz
Oxford Economic Papers, 2014, vol. 66, issue 2, 605-626
Abstract:
Recent research results cast doubt on the validity of the employer learning model by empirically establishing the absence of learning over time among college graduates and by documenting persistent, negative effects of graduating during a recession. This paper extends the employer learning model with the theory of rational inattention in which firms optimally allocate limited attention (i.e., information processing capacity) to learning about the productivities of different workers. I find that firms allocate more attention to workers who have a higher impact on profits (i.e., college graduates) and learn as much as possible in the current period. Taken together these results imply the absence of learning over time for college graduates and indicate that a college graduate that gets (mis)matched to a job with a lower impact on profits will find herself at a persistent disadvantage. The paper therefore resolves the discrepancy between the data and the employer learning model.
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpt009 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Rational Inattention and Employer Learning (2010) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:66:y:2014:i:2:p:605-626.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Oxford Economic Papers is currently edited by James Forder and Francis J. Teal
More articles in Oxford Economic Papers from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().