Does knowledge tradeability make secrecy more attractive than patents? An analysis of IPR strategies and licensing

Frederique Goy and Changtao Wang

Oxford Economic Papers, 2016, vol. 68, issue 1, 64-88

Abstract: Despite the considerable protection provided by the patent system, a surprisingly small number of firms use patents, instead favouring the use of secrecy. This suggests that natural market forces protect inventors so that formal protections are not necessary. Using firm-level data, this study provides the first empirical evidence on the relationship between knowledge tradeability and the choice of IPR protection methods. Consistent with recent theoretical results, we find that firms engaged in licensing agreements are more likely to use secrecy than patents and that the largest R&D investors tend to use secrecy more than patents. Also, large firms, or manufacturing firms of any size are more likely to use patents, whilst firms that obtain information from internal and non-market sources are more inclined to use secrecy.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpv051 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:68:y:2016:i:1:p:64-88.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Economic Papers is currently edited by James Forder and Francis J. Teal

More articles in Oxford Economic Papers from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().