How important is precautionary labour supply?
Robin Jessen,
Davud Rostam-Afschar and
Sebastian Schmitz
Oxford Economic Papers, 2018, vol. 70, issue 3, 868-891
Abstract:
We quantify the importance of precautionary labour supply defined as the difference between hours supplied in the presence of risk and hours under perfect foresight. Using the German Socio-Economic Panel from 2001 to 2012, we estimate the effect of wage risk on labour supply and test for constrained adjustment of labour supply. We find that married men choose on average about 2.8% of their hours of work to shield against wage shocks. The effect is strongest for self-employed, who we find to be unconstrained in their hours choices, but also relevant for other groups with more persistent hours constraints. If the self-employed faced the same wage risk as the median civil servant, their hours of work would be reduced by 4.5%.
JEL-codes: C23 D12 E21 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpx053 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: How Important Is Precautionary Labor Supply? (2016) 
Working Paper: How important is precautionary labor supply? (2016) 
Working Paper: How important is precautionary labor supply? (2016) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:70:y:2018:i:3:p:868-891.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Oxford Economic Papers is currently edited by James Forder and Francis J. Teal
More articles in Oxford Economic Papers from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().