Effective skill: a new theoretical perspective on the relation between skills, skill use, mismatches, and wages
Rolf Van der Velden () and
Ineke Bijlsma
Oxford Economic Papers, 2019, vol. 71, issue 1, 145-165
Abstract:
Skills and skill mismatches affect workers’ productivity. However, current approaches to measuring this problem fail to specify the underlying mechanism. In this paper, we develop a new perspective by integrating skill proficiency and skill use into a new concept called ‘effective skill’. Effective skill is defined as a multiplicative function of skill proficiency and skill use. The intuitive understanding of this concept is that a skill can have no effect on productivity if it is not used and, vice versa, the effect of using skills is moderated by the skill proficiency level. We develop a skill matching model using data from the OECD PIAAC Survey. We show that there is no effect of numeracy on wages, other than through the use of numeracy skills. Moreover, we show that a skill mismatch model based on this concept is superior to alternative skill mismatch models in explaining wage differences.
JEL-codes: I26 J24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpy028 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:71:y:2019:i:1:p:145-165.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
Oxford Economic Papers is currently edited by James Forder and Francis J. Teal
More articles in Oxford Economic Papers from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().