EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inequality and market concentration, when shareholding is more skewed than consumption

Joshua Gans, Andrew Leigh, Martin Schmalz and Adam Triggs

Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2019, vol. 35, issue 3, 550-563

Abstract: Economic theory suggests that monopoly prices hurt consumers but benefit shareholders. But in a world where individuals or households can be both consumers and shareholders, the impact of market power on inequality depends in part on the relative distribution of consumption and corporate equity ownership across individuals or households. The paper calculates this distribution for the United States, using data from the Survey of Consumer Finances and the Consumer Expenditure Survey, spanning nearly three decades from 1989 to 2016. In 2016, the top 20 per cent consumed approximately as much as the bottom 60 per cent, but had 15 times as much corporate equity. Because ownership is more skewed than consumption, increased mark-ups increase inequality. Moreover, over time, corporate equity has become even more skewed relative to consumption.

Keywords: monopoly; market power; inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grz011 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Inequality and Market Concentration, when Shareholding is more Skewed than Consumption (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: Inequality and market concentration, when shareholding is more skewed than consumption (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: Inequality and Market Concentration, When Shareholding Is More Skewed Than Consumption (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: Inequality and Market Concentration, When Shareholding is More Skewed than Consumption (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxford:v:35:y:2019:i:3:p:550-563.

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Review of Economic Policy is currently edited by Christopher Adam

More articles in Oxford Review of Economic Policy from Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:35:y:2019:i:3:p:550-563.