Inequality and market concentration, when shareholding is more skewed than consumption

Joshua Gans, Andrew Leigh, Martin Schmalz and Adam Triggs

CAMA Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University

Abstract: Economic theory suggests that monopoly prices hurt consumers but benefit shareholders. But in a world where individuals or households can be both consumers and shareholders, the impact of market power on inequality depends in part on the relative distribution of consumption and corporate equity ownership across individuals or households. The paper calculates this distribution for the United States, using data from the Survey of Consumer Finances and the Consumer Expenditure Survey, spanning nearly three decades from 1989 to 2016. In 2016, the top 20 percent consumed approximately as much as the bottom 60 percent, but had 13 times as much corporate equity. Because ownership is more skewed than consumption, increased mark-ups increase inequality. Moreover, over time, corporate equity has become even more skewed relative to consumption.

Keywords: Monopoly; market power; inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D42 D43 D61 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
Date: 2018-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-com
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cama.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/fil ... h_schmalz_triggs.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Inequality and market concentration, when shareholding is more skewed than consumption (2019)
Working Paper: Inequality and Market Concentration, when Shareholding is more Skewed than Consumption (2018)
Working Paper: Inequality and Market Concentration, When Shareholding Is More Skewed Than Consumption (2018)
Working Paper: Inequality and Market Concentration, When Shareholding is More Skewed than Consumption (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:een:camaaa:2018-62

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CAMA Working Papers from Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cama Admin ().