Disorganization

Olivier Blanchard and Michael Kremer

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, vol. 112, issue 4, 1091-1126

Abstract: Under central planning, many firms relied on a single supplier for critical inputs. Transition has led to decentralized bargaining between suppliers and buyers. Under incomplete contracts or asymmetric information, bargaining may inefficiently break down, and if chains of production link many specialized producers, output will decline sharply. Mechanisms that mitigate these problems in the West, such as reputation, can only play a limited role in transition. The empirical evidence suggests that output has fallen farthest for the goods with the most complex production process, and that disorganization has been more important in the former Soviet Union than in Central Europe.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (109)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1162/003355300555439 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Disorganization (1997)
Working Paper: Disorganization (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:112:y:1997:i:4:p:1091-1126.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().