Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests

Gary Charness and Matthew Rabin

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, vol. 117, issue 3, 817-869

Abstract: Departures from self-interest in economic experiments have recently inspired models of "social preferences." We design a range of simple experimental games that test these theories more directly than existing experiments. Our experiments show that subjects are more concerned with increasing social welfare—sacrificing to increase the payoffs for all recipients, especially low-payoff recipients—than with reducing differences in payoffs (as supposed in recent models). Subjects are also motivated by reciprocity: they withdraw willingness to sacrifice to achieve a fair outcome when others are themselves unwilling to sacrifice, and sometimes punish unfair behavior.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2558)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1162/003355302760193904 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests (2003)
Working Paper: Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests (2002)
Working Paper: Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests (2001)
Working Paper: UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL PREFERENCES WITH SIMPLE TESTS (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:117:y:2002:i:3:p:817-869.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().