Cowards and Heroes: Group Loyalty in the American Civil War

Dora Costa and Matthew Kahn

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, vol. 118, issue 2, 519-548

Abstract: What motivated men to risk death in the most horrific war in U. S. history when pay was low and irregular and military punishment strategies were weak? In such a situation creating group loyalty by promoting social capital is of paramount importance and in the Civil War was the cement of both armies. We find that individual and company socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, ideology, and morale were important predictors of group loyalty in the Union Army. Company characteristics were more important than ideology or morale. Soldiers in companies that were more homogeneous in ethnicity, occupation, and age were less likely to shirk.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (88)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1162/003355303321675446 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Cowards and Heroes: Group Loyalty in the American Civil War (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:118:y:2003:i:2:p:519-548.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().