The German Bank Act of 1934: A Correction

M. Dessauer

The Review of Economic Studies, 1936, vol. 3, issue 2, 139

Abstract: I should like to correct an error which slipped into my article, "The German Bank Act of 1934," in Vol. II, No. 3, of this Review, p. 217. The phrase, "This ratio also implies a limit, but in contrast to the cash ratio, it is a maximum limit" should read: "This ratio is imposed by the law as a minimum, as in the case of the cash ratio; but in reality it will figure as a maximum as long as the cash ratio is. far from being reached, and the assets forming this second line of defence will be the only means to fill up the first." The remainder of the paragraph shows the reasons for this assumption.

Date: 1936
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2967504 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:3:y:1936:i:2:p:139.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().