Why is Consumption So Smooth?

John Campbell and Angus Deaton

The Review of Economic Studies, 1989, vol. 56, issue 3, 357-373

Abstract: For thirty years it has been accepted that consumption is smooth because permanent income is smoother than measured income. This paper considers the evidence for the contrary position, that permanent income is in fact less smooth than measured income, so that the smoothness of consumption cannot be straightforwardly explained by permanent income theory. The paper argues that in postwar U.S. quarterly data, consumption is smooth because it responds with a lag to changes in income.

Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (361)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2297552 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Why Is Consumption So Smooth? (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:56:y:1989:i:3:p:357-373.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().