Stock Market Forecastability and Volatility: A Statistical Appraisal

N. Gregory Mankiw, David Romer and Matthew Shapiro

The Review of Economic Studies, 1991, vol. 58, issue 3, 455-477

Abstract: This paper presents and implements statistical tests of stock market forecastability and volatility that are immune from the severe statistical problems of earlier tests. It finds that although the null hypothesis of market efficiency is rejected, the rejections are only marginal. The paper also shows how volatility tests and recent regression tests are closely related, and demonstrates that when finite sample biases are taken into account, regression tests also fail to provide strong evidence of violations of the conventional valuation model.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (55)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2298006 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: STOCK MARKET FORECASTABILITY AND VOLATILITY: A STATISTICAL APPRAISAL (1989)
Working Paper: Stock Market Forecastability and Volatility: A Statistical Appraisal (1989)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:58:y:1991:i:3:p:455-477.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().