Noisy Observation in Adverse Selection Models
B. Caillaud,
Roger Guesnerie () and
Patrick Rey
The Review of Economic Studies, 1992, vol. 59, issue 3, 595-615
Abstract:
We consider a principal-agent contracting problem under incomplete information where some of the agent's actions are imperfectly observable. Contracts take the form of reward schedules based on the noisy observation of the agent's action. We first review situations where the principal can reach the same utility as in the absence of noise. Then we focus on the use of linear reward schedules, which allow universal implementation, i.e. implementation of a given mechanism for any unbiased noise of observation, and on quadratic reward schedules, which only require the knowledge of the variance of the noise. We exhibit sufficient conditions under which linear reward schedules implement a given mechanism. Finally, we characterize necessary conditions for a mechanism to be implementable under noisy observation by a linear schedule, and by quadratic schedules. We give the geometric intuition behind all results.
Date: 1992
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (55)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2297866 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Noisy observation in adverse selection models (1989) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:59:y:1992:i:3:p:595-615.
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman
More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().