EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Implementation in Undominated Strategies: A Look at Bounded Mechanisms

Matthew Jackson

The Review of Economic Studies, 1992, vol. 59, issue 4, 757-775

Abstract: This paper examines the impact of placing natural restrictions on the mechanisms considered for implementation problems. It is shown that if all mechanisms are considered and preferences satisfy a basic condition, then any social choice correspondence can be implemented in undominated strategies. An example points out that the strength of this result derives from the use of mechanisms with questionable features. In part of the message space the agent who announces the highest integer is rewarded. This sort of "tail-chasing" construction, common in the constructive proofs of the literature, is used to assure that undesired strategy combinations do not form an equilibrium. If such mechanisms are ruled out, then the social choice correspondences which can be implemented in undominated strategies satisfy an incentive compatibility type condition called strategy-resistence. For social choice functions this is equivalent to strategy-proofness. This contrast suggests that this issue should be examined as it applies to other solution concepts used in implementation theory. The last portion of the paper begins to explore the issue as it relates to Nash implementation and undominated Nash implementation.

Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (197)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2297996 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Implementation in Undominated Strategies - A Look at Bounded Mechanisms (1989) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:59:y:1992:i:4:p:757-775.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-02
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:59:y:1992:i:4:p:757-775.