EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Characterizations of the Existence of Equilibria in Games with Discontinuous and Non-quasiconcave Payoffs

Michael Baye, Guoqiang Tian and Jianxin Zhou

The Review of Economic Studies, 1993, vol. 60, issue 4, 935-948

Abstract: This paper characterizes pure-strategy and dominant-strategy Nash equilibrium in non-cooperative games which may have discontinuous and/or non-quasiconcave payoffs. Conditions called diagonal transfer quasiconcavity and uniform transfer quasiconcavity are shown to be necessary and, with conditions called diagonal transfer continuity and transfer upper semicontinuity, sufficient for the existence of pure-strategy and dominant-strategy Nash equilibrium, respectively. The results are used to examine the existence or non-existence of equilibrium in some well-known economic games with discontinuous and/or non-quasiconcave payoffs. For example, we show that the failure of the existence of a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium in the Hotelling model is due to the failure of an aggregator function to be diagonal transfer quasiconcave—not the failure of payoffs to be quasiconcave, as has been elsewhere conjectured.

Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (89)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2298107 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:60:y:1993:i:4:p:935-948.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:60:y:1993:i:4:p:935-948.