Diffusion of Technical Change and the Decomposition of Output into Trend and Cycle
Marco Lippi () and
Lucrezia Reichlin ()
Review of Economic Studies, 1994, vol. 61, issue 1, 19-30
In this paper we argue that modelling the trend component in real GNP as a random walk is inconsistent with its interpretation as productivity growth. As an alternative, we specify the trend as an ARIMA whose impulse response function follows an S-shaped pattern reflecting the process of diffusion of technical change. Such an ARIMA is employed to build and estimate an UCARIMA using USA postwar quarterly data. We find that our model, although more parsimonious, fits the data equally well than the standard random walk plus AR(2) cycle. Moreover, our model has a very low cycle/trend variance ratio.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Diffusion of technical change and the decomposition of output into trend and cycle (1994)
Working Paper: Diffusion of Technical Change and the Decomposition of Output into Trend and Cycle (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:61:y:1994:i:1:p:19-30.
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Andrea Prat, Bruno Biais, Kjetil Storesletten and Enrique Sentana
More articles in Review of Economic Studies from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().