EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A New Approach to Evaluating Trade Policy

James Anderson and J. Peter Neary

The Review of Economic Studies, 1996, vol. 63, issue 1, 107-125

Abstract: This paper introduces a new index number, the Trade Restrictiveness Index, which measures the restrictiveness of a system of trade protection. The index is a general equilibrium application of the distance function and answers the question: "What uniform set of trade restrictions is equivalent (in welfare terms) to the initial protective structure?" The index is applicable to both tariffs and quotas and permits international and intertemporal comparisons. The index is operational and we provide two empirical examples to illustrate its applicability and to show its superiority to commonly used measures.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (199)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2298117 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: A New Approach to Evaluating Trade Policy (1993)
Working Paper: A New Approach to Evaluating Trade Policy (1992) Downloads
Working Paper: A new approach to evaluating trade policy (1992) Downloads
Working Paper: A new approach to evaluating trade policy (1991) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:63:y:1996:i:1:p:107-125.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:63:y:1996:i:1:p:107-125.