Ruling Out Multiplicity and Indeterminacy: The Role of Heterogeneity
Berthold Herrendorf,
Akos Valentinyi () and
Robert Waldmann ()
The Review of Economic Studies, 2000, vol. 67, issue 2, 295-307
Abstract:
It is well known that economies of scale that are external to the individual decision makers can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies and the multiplicity or even indeterminacy of equilibrium. We argue that the importance of this source of multiplicity and indeterminacy is overstated in representative agent models, as they ignore the potential stabilizing effect of heterogeneity. We illustrate this in a version of Matsuyama's (1991) two-sector model with increasing returns to scale. Two main results are shown. First, sufficient homogeneity with respect to individual productivity leads to the instability and non-uniqueness of a given stationary state and the indeterminacy of the corresponding stationary state equilibrium. Second, sufficient heterogeneity leads to the global saddle-path stability and the uniqueness of a given stationary state and the global uniqueness of equilibrium.
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (66)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-937X.00132 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Ruling out multiplicity and indeterminacy: The role of heterogeneity (1999) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:67:y:2000:i:2:p:295-307.
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman
More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().