EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Second Opinions and Price Competition: Inefficiency in the Market for Expert Advice

Wolfgang Pesendorfer () and Asher Wolinsky

The Review of Economic Studies, 2003, vol. 70, issue 2, 417-437

Abstract: We consider a market in which an expert must exert costly but unobservable effort to identify the service that meets the consumer's need. In our model, experts offer competing contracts and the consumer may gather multiple opinions. We explore the incentives that a competitive sampling of prices and opinions provides for experts to exert effort and find that there is a tension between price competition and the equilibrium effort. In particular, the equilibrium fails to realize the second best welfare optimum. An intervention, that limits price competition via price control, increases welfare. Copyright 2003, Wiley-Blackwell.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (103)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-937X.00250 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Second Opinions and Price Competition: Inefficiency in the Market for Expert Advice (2000) Downloads
Working Paper: Second Opinions and Price Competition Inefficiency in the Market for Expert Advice (1998) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:70:y:2003:i:2:p:417-437

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:70:y:2003:i:2:p:417-437