Learning Under Ambiguity
Larry Epstein and
Martin Schneider
The Review of Economic Studies, 2007, vol. 74, issue 4, 1275-1303
Abstract:
This paper considers learning when the distinction between risk and ambiguity matters. It first describes thought experiments, dynamic variants of those provided by Ellsberg, that highlight a sense in which the Bayesian learning model is extreme—it models agents who are implausibly ambitious about what they can learn in complicated environments. The paper then provides a generalization of the Bayesian model that accommodates the intuitive choices in the thought experiments. In particular, the model allows decision-makers' confidence about the environment to change—along with beliefs—as they learn. A portfolio choice application compares the effect of changes in confidence under ambiguity vs. changes in estimation risk under Bayesian learning. The former is shown to induce a trend towards more stock market participation and investment even when the latter does not. Copyright 2007, Wiley-Blackwell.
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (215)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00464.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Learning Under Ambiguity (2006) 
Working Paper: Learning Under Ambiguity (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:74:y:2007:i:4:p:1275-1303
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman
More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().