EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games

Frank Heinemann, Rosemarie Nagel and Peter Ockenfels

The Review of Economic Studies, 2009, vol. 76, issue 1, 181-221

Abstract: This paper proposes a method to measure strategic uncertainty by eliciting certainty equivalents analogous to measuring risk attitudes in lotteries. We apply this method by conducting experiments on a class of one-shot coordination games with strategic complementarities and choices between simple lotteries and sure payoff alternatives, both framed in a similar way. Despite the multiplicity of equilibria in the coordination games, aggregate behaviour is fairly predictable. The pure or mixed Nash equilibria cannot describe subjects' behaviour. We present two global games with private information about monetary payoffs and about risk aversion. While previous literature treats the parameters of a global game as given, we estimate them and show that both models describe observed behaviour well. The global-game selection for vanishing noise of private signals offers a good recommendation for actual players, given the observed distribution of actions. We also deduce subjective beliefs and compare them with objective probabilities. Copyright , Wiley-Blackwell.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (180)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00512.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Measuring strategic uncertainty in coordination games (2004) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:76:y:2009:i:1:p:181-221

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-02
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:76:y:2009:i:1:p:181-221