Parental Leave and Mothers' Careers: The Relative Importance of Job Protection and Cash Benefits

Rafael Lalive (), Analia Schlosser, Andreas Steinhauer () and Josef Zweimüller ()

Review of Economic Studies, 2014, vol. 81, issue 1, 219-265

Abstract: Job protection and cash benefits are key elements of parental leave (PL) systems. We study how these two policy instruments affect return-to-work and medium-run labour market outcomes of mothers of newborn children. Analysing a series of major PL policy changes in Austria, we find that longer cash benefits lead to a significant delay in return-to-work, particularly so in the period that is job-protected. Prolonged parental leave absence induced by these policy changes does not appear to hurt mothers' labour market outcomes in the medium run. We build a non-stationary model of job search after childbirth to isolate the role of the two policy instruments. The model matches return-to-work and return to same employer profiles under the various factual policy configurations. Counterfactual policy simulations indicate that a system that combines cash with protection dominates other systems in generating time for care immediately after birth while maintaining mothers' medium-run labour market attachment. Copyright 2014, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (63) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdt028 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Parental Leave and Mothers' Careers: The Relative Importance of Job Protection and Cash Benets (2011)
Working Paper: Parental Leave and Mothers' Careers: The Relative Importance of Job Protection and Cash Benefits (2011)
Working Paper: Parental Leave and Mothers' Careers: The Relative Importance of Job Protection and Cash Benefits (2011)
Working Paper: Parental leave and mothers' careers: the relative importance of job protection and cash benefits (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:81:y:2014:i:1:p:219-265

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Andrea Prat, Bruno Biais, Kjetil Storesletten and Enrique Sentana

More articles in Review of Economic Studies from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().