EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Quid Pro Quo: Technology Capital Transfers for Market Access in China

Thomas J. Holmes, Ellen McGrattan and Edward Prescott

The Review of Economic Studies, 2015, vol. 82, issue 3, 1154-1193

Abstract: By the 1970s, quid pro quo policy, which requires multinational firms to transfer technology in return for market access, had become a common practice in many developing countries. While many countries have subsequently liberalized quid pro quo requirements, China continues to follow the policy. In this article, we incorporate quid pro quo policy into a multicountry dynamic general equilibrium model, using microevidence from Chinese patents to motivate key assumptions about the terms of the technology transfer deals and macroevidence on China's inward foreign direct investment (FDI) to estimate key model parameters. We then use the model to quantify the impact of China's quid pro quo policy and show that it has had a significant impact on global innovation and welfare.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (60)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdv008 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Quid pro quo: Technology capital transfers for market access in China (2013) Downloads
Working Paper: Quid Pro Quo: Technology Capital Transfers for Market Access in China (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:82:y:2015:i:3:p:1154-1193.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:82:y:2015:i:3:p:1154-1193.