Should Unemployment Insurance Vary with the Unemployment Rate? Theory and Evidence

Kory Kroft and Matthew Notowidigdo

The Review of Economic Studies, 2016, vol. 83, issue 3, 1092-1124

Abstract: We study how the marginal welfare gain from increasing the unemployment insurance (UI) benefit level varies over the business cycle. We do this by estimating how the moral hazard cost and the consumption smoothing benefit of UI vary with labour market conditions, which we identify using variation in the interaction of UI benefit levels with the unemployment rate within U.S. states over time. We find that the moral hazard cost is procyclical, greater when the unemployment rate is relatively low. By contrast, we do not find evidence that the consumption smoothing benefit varies with the unemployment rate. We use these empirical results to estimate the marginal welfare gain, and we find that it is modest on average, but varies positively with the unemployment rate.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (90)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdw009 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Should Unemployment Insurance Vary with the Unemployment Rate? Theory and Evidence (2012)
Working Paper: Should Unemployment Insurance Vary With the Unemployment Rate? Theory and Evidence (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:83:y:2016:i:3:p:1092-1124.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().