EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Researcher’s Dilemma

Catherine Bobtcheff (), Jérôme Bolte () and Thomas Mariotti

Review of Economic Studies, 2017, vol. 84, issue 3, 969-1014

Abstract: We propose and analyse a general model of priority races. Researchers privately have breakthroughs and decide how long to let their ideas mature before disclosing them, thereby establishing priority. Two-researcher, symmetric priority races have a unique equilibrium that can be characterized by a differential equation. We study how the shapes of the breakthrough distribution and of the returns to maturation affect maturation delays and research quality, both in dynamic and comparative statics analyses. Making researchers better at discovering new ideas or at developing them has contrasted effects on research quality. Being closer to the technological frontier enhances the value of maturation for researchers, which mitigates the negative impact on research quality of the race for priority. Finally, when researchers differ in their abilities to do creative work or in the technologies they use to develop their ideas, more efficient researchers always let their ideas mature more than their less efficient opponents. Our theoretical results shed light on academic competition, patent races, and innovation quality.

Keywords: Priority races; Potential competition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C73 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdw038 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Researcher's Dilemma (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: Researcher's Dilemma (2015) Downloads
Working Paper: Researcher's Dilemma (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:84:y:2017:i:3:p:969-1014.

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Andrea PratEditor-Name: Bruno BiaisEditor-Name: Kjetil StoreslettenEditor-Name: Enrique Sentana

More articles in Review of Economic Studies from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2020-03-29
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:84:y:2017:i:3:p:969-1014.