EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Risk Aversion and the Value of Life

Juan Cordoba and Marla Ripoll ()

Review of Economic Studies, 2017, vol. 84, issue 4, 1472-1509

Abstract: We show that state non-separable preferences à la Epstein–Zin–Weil (EZW) provide a tractable and flexible framework to study the economics of health and longevity. This utility representation: (1) admits a preference for timing of resolution of uncertainty regarding mortality risks; (2) links the marginal valuation of survival to the level of survival; (3) can preserve homotheticity even for low degrees of intertemporal substitution without generating implausible predictions regarding the value of life; and (4) adds needed flexibility to account for the empirical evidence on the value of life. We illustrate the implications of EZW preferences for the economic value of observed differences in life expectancy across countries and over time, and for the value of life over the life cycle.

Keywords: Life expectancy; Value of statistical life; Epstein–Zin–Weil preferences; Welfare; AIDS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I15 J17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdw053 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:84:y:2017:i:4:p:1472-1509.

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Andrea PratEditor-Name: Bruno BiaisEditor-Name: Kjetil StoreslettenEditor-Name: Enrique Sentana

More articles in Review of Economic Studies from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2020-02-23
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:84:y:2017:i:4:p:1472-1509.