EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Endowment Effects in the Field: Evidence from India’s IPO Lotteries

Santosh Anagol, Vimal Balasubramaniam () and Tarun Ramadorai ()

Review of Economic Studies, 2018, vol. 85, issue 4, 1971-2004

Abstract: We study a unique field experiment in India in which 1.5 million stock investors face lotteries for the random allocation of shares. We find that the winners of these randomly assigned initial public offering (IPO) lottery shares are significantly more likely to hold them than lottery losers 1, 6, and even 24 months after the random allocation. This finding strongly evokes laboratory findings of an “endowment effect” for risky gambles, and persists in samples of highly active investors, suggesting along with additional evidence that this behaviour is not driven by inertia alone. The effect decreases as experience in the IPO market increases, but remains even for very experienced investors. Leading theories of the endowment effect based on reference-dependent preferences are unable to fully explain these and other findings in the data.

Keywords: Endowment effect; Exchange asymmetry; Reference dependence; Loss aversion; Salience; Inattention; Lotteries; Causal inference; India (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G14 C93 D12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdy014 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Endowment Effects in the Field: Evidence from India's IPO Lotteries (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: Endowment Effects in the Field: Evidence from India's IPO Lotteries (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:85:y:2018:i:4:p:1971-2004.

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Andrea Prat, Bruno Biais, Kjetil Storesletten and Enrique Sentana

More articles in Review of Economic Studies from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2019-08-20
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:85:y:2018:i:4:p:1971-2004.