EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Salience, Myopia, and Complex Dynamic Incentives: Evidence from Medicare Part D

Christina Dalton, Gautam Gowrisankaran and Robert J Town

The Review of Economic Studies, 2020, vol. 87, issue 2, 822-869

Abstract: The standard Medicare Part D drug insurance contract is non-linear—with reduced subsidies in a coverage gap—resulting in a dynamic purchase problem. We consider enrolees who arrived near the gap early in the year and show that they should expect to enter the gap with high probability, implying that, under a benchmark model with neoclassical preferences, the gap should impact them very little. We find that these enrolees have flat spending in a period before the doughnut hole and a large spending drop in the gap, providing evidence against the benchmark model. We structurally estimate behavioural dynamic drug purchase models and find that a price salience model where enrolees do not incorporate future prices into their decision-making at all fits the data best. For a nationally representative sample, full price salience would decrease enrolee spending by 31%. Entirely eliminating the gap would increase insurer spending 27%, compared to 7% for generic-drug-only gap coverage.

Keywords: Non-linear prices; Cost sharing; Doughnut hole; Discontinuity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 I13 I18 L88 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdz023 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Salience, Myopia, and Complex Dynamic Incentives: Evidence from Medicare Part D (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:87:y:2020:i:2:p:822-869.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:87:y:2020:i:2:p:822-869.