Optimal Automatic Stabilizers

Consumption versus Expenditure

Alisdair McKay and Ricardo Reis

The Review of Economic Studies, 2021, vol. 88, issue 5, 2375-2406

Abstract: Should the generosity of unemployment benefits and the progressivity of income taxes depend on the presence of business cycles? This paper proposes a tractable model where there is a role for social insurance against uninsurable shocks to income and unemployment, as well as business cycles that are inefficient due to the presence of matching frictions and nominal rigidities. We derive an augmented Baily–Chetty formula showing that the optimal generosity of the social insurance system depends on a macroeconomic stabilization term. This term pushes for an increase in generosity when the level of economic activity is more responsive to social programmes in recessions than in booms. A calibration to the US economy shows that taking concerns for macroeconomic stabilization into account substantially raises the optimal unemployment insurance replacement rate but has a negligible impact on the optimal progressivity of the income tax. More generally, the role of social insurance programmes as automatic stabilizers affects their optimal design.

Keywords: Counter-cyclical fiscal policy; Redistribution; Distortionary taxes; E62; H21; H30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdaa038 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Optimal automatic stabilizers (2021)
Working Paper: Optimal Automatic Stabilizers (2016)
Working Paper: Optimal Automatic Stabilizers (2016)
Working Paper: Optimal automatic stabilizers (2016)
Working Paper: Optimal automatic stabilizers (2016)
Working Paper: Optimal Automatic Stabilizers (2016)
Working Paper: Optimal Automatic Stabilizers (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:88:y:2021:i:5:p:2375-2406.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().