Resolving Range Conflict in Nevada? Buyouts and Other Compensation Alternatives
Gerrit van Kooten,
Roy W. Thomsen and
Tom Hobby
Review of Agricultural Economics, 2006, vol. 28, issue 4, 515-530
Abstract:
To mitigate the adverse effects of reduced access to public forage, ranchers may require financial or other forms of "compensation." In this paper, we use results from a survey of Nevada ranchers to examine their willingness to sell grazing permits and participate in other schemes that enable them to continue ranching in spite of declining access to public forage. On average, ranchers demand $255 per animal unit month to sell grazing permits, while support for other programs, some of which are performance based, depends on whether respondents trust public agencies and intend to pass their ranch onto an heir.
Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00319.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Journal Article: Resolving Range Conflict in Nevada? Buyouts and Other Compensation Alternatives (2006) 
Working Paper: Resolving Range Conflict in Nevada? Buyouts and Other Compensation Alternatives (2005) 
Working Paper: Resolving Range Conflict in Nevada? Buyouts and Other Compensation Alternatives (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:28:y:2006:i:4:p:515-530.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().