Resolving Range Conflict in Nevada? Buyouts and Other Compensation Alternatives

Gerrit van Kooten, Roy W. Thomsen and Thomas G. Hobby

No 37023, Working Papers from University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy

Abstract: To mitigate adverse effects on ranchers from reduced access to public forage, financial or other forms of ‘compensation’ may be required. In this paper, we use results from a survey of Nevada ranchers to examine ranchers’ willingness to sell grazing permits and participate in other schemes that enable them to continue ranching in spite of declining access to public forage. On average ranchers demand $255 per AUM to sell grazing permits, while support for other programs, some of which are performance based, depends on whether respondents trust public agencies and intend to pass their ranch on to an heir.

Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy; Land Economics/Use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30
Date: 2005-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/37023/files/WorkingPaper2005-13.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Resolving Range Conflict in Nevada? Buyouts and Other Compensation Alternatives (2006)
Journal Article: Resolving Range Conflict in Nevada? Buyouts and Other Compensation Alternatives (2006)
Working Paper: Resolving Range Conflict in Nevada? Buyouts and Other Compensation Alternatives (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uvicwp:37023

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.37023

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().