The Direct and Indirect Costs of Food-Safety Regulation

Michael Ollinger and Danna Moore ()

Review of Agricultural Economics, 2009, vol. 31, issue 2, 247-265

Abstract: The compliance costs of the Pathogen Reduction Hazard Analysis Critical Control Program (PR/HACCP) rule have been controversial. Previous reports have used limited data to evaluate its overall and component costs. This paper addresses those deficiencies by examining compliance costs with data from a national survey of meat and poultry plants. Results indicate that (a) regulation favors large, more specialized plants over small, diversified ones, (b) private actions incur considerable costs, and (c), except for chicken slaughter, Federally mandated processing tasks are 160–500% more costly than allowing plants to meet standards using whatever food-safety technology they choose.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01436.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Journal Article: The Direct and Indirect Costs of Food-Safety Regulation (2009)
Working Paper: The Direct and Indirect Costs of Food Safety Regulation (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revage:v:31:y:2009:i:2:p:247-265.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Agricultural Economics from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ) and Christopher F. Baum ().