Performance Pay, CEO Dismissal, and the Dual Role of Takeovers
Mike Burkart () and
Review of Finance, 2015, vol. 19, issue 4, 1383-1414
We propose that an active takeover market provides incentives by offering acquisition opportunities to successful managers. This allows firms to reduce performance-based compensation and can rationalize loss-making acquisitions. When choosing its acquisition policy and the quality of its board, each firm ignores the adverse effect on other firms’ acquisition opportunities and takeover threat. As a result, the takeover market is not sufficiently liquid and too few takeovers occur. Furthermore, liquidity in the takeover and managerial labor markets are inversely related. When poaching managers becomes more profitable, firms invest more in board quality which in turn reduces the incidence of takeovers.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Performance pay, CEO dismissal, and the dual role of takeovers (2015)
Working Paper: Performance Pay, CEO Dismissal, and the Dual Role of Takeovers (2012)
Working Paper: Performance Pay, CEO Dismissal, and the Dual Role of Takeovers (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:revfin:v:19:y:2015:i:4:p:1383-1414.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Finance is currently edited by Josef Zechner and Marco Pagano
More articles in Review of Finance from European Finance Association Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().